Demographics Can Be Terrifying

Wed 14 Mar 2007

From the Big-Brother-benevolence of Claritas, via Hitwise:

“‘Young Digerati are the nation’s tech-savvy singles and couples living in fashionable neighborhoods on the urban fringe. Affluent, highly educated and ethnically mixed, Young Digerati communities are typically filled with trendy apartments and condos, fitness clubs and clothing boutiques, casual restaurants and all types of bars-from juice to coffee to microbrew.’

The lifestyle and media behaviors they are more likely than the general population to engage in, according to Claritas, are: shopping at Banana Republic, Amazon.com and Bloomingdale’s, going snowboarding and scuba diving, visiting spas, spending more than $3000 on foreign travel in the past year, watching IFC, Showtime and HBO, and driving an Audi A4. Sound familiar? There are even more statistics that can be gathered about the lifestyles of this segment, as shown here.”

It’s an S4, thank you very much.

picayune | permalink | comments (0)


Passive Job Searching, and My Ongoing Thoughts About It

Tue 6 Mar 2007

Over the last few years, an increasing number of friends scattered across a variety of industries mentioned that their employers discouraged—even persecuted—anything interpreted as job searching. One company (which many could guess if you know me but a little) even went so far as to demand employees take down long-running LinkedIn and Monster profiles, and ordered managers to stop giving—and even take down—endorsements or recommendations for employees.

Now, I think removing Monster profiles was probably a good thing—that job board has been spammed and mobbed into a C- or D-grade resource for anyone who works with a computer. “Cook Looking For Something Different in Computers”, indeed. But the anecdote repetition got me thinking about the ethics involved in these company’s tactics,hubristic as they are. Persecuting employees for perceived job searching activity is unethical. On company time, I can’t fault HR for the completely deluded notion that employes devote every minute of their time at work to the company’s bottom line. Ideally, that should be a hallmark of the professionalism and respect employees bring to a good, self-respecting job. But confronting employees about their out-of-work activities on career-related websites due to assumptions about job searching is wrong—wholly and with very, very few shades of grey.

As awareness of digital identities increases, employers are learning that the internet is a great way to research candidates for the stains bleached out of résumés. Awareness is only growing; the media love a good tech feature about college-fresh job candidates dropped from consideration due to the archive of their college bong-huffing, hazing, sub-human, foul-mouthed behavior on MySpace. As an infrequent hiring manager, I can see the appeal. But modern HR teams have yet to really describe (to me, at least) how googling a candidate’s past differs from asking questions that bring out potentially discriminatory information. You can’t ask a candidate, “what are your late-night hobbies”, but you can google it. Someone want to clarify where the line is?

Employees, on the other hand, are just as quick as HR teams to realize the trouble spot of questionable digital wake. As a result, we get an ever-increasing collection of websites and services catering to digital “self” management, like Naymz, ClaimID, Jobster and others. But beyond denying the fact you are a real flesh-and-blood-and-stupidity human being, employees quickly learn that managing their digital self also helps position themselves in their field. Search results concerning “’Tiff Fehr’ [vilified drug of choice]” might be of interest to future employers, but the results for “’Tiff Fehr’ web developer” is equally helpful to me. Most job boards these days not only address job opportunities, but also hit up identity management and networking. Any employee worth their salt sees the importance of the latter two. Passive, exploratory job searching is just another research angle. It’s in your careerist interest to keep tabs on shifting job roles, pay scales, team composition and education backgrounds.

To me, this is where it gets muddy—it’s okay for HR to do or hire out “compensation analyses” and “hierarchy level implementations” that affect your skills, position and pay, but it’s not okay for you to keep tabs on tools that help your career research (or at least get caught near them). I’m studying Ajax and DOM scripting because it showed up on peer resumes, education backgrounds, and, most importantly, job descriptions for companies and projects in which I want to be involved. No HR person made that benevolent recommendation to me, and none have ever expressed that level of interest in what I do, even if they hired me.

Passive job searching via RSS—or, hell, actively at the sites themselves—is now so intertwined with being aware of your industry and career that it’s laughable to think it can be quashed with questionably ethical company policy. Any company that does so should be regarded with skepticism, if not a bit of contempt for purely reactive policies. Which encourages job searching. And, in the immortal words of Tevin Campbell (á la Prince), we go ’round and ’round and ’round.

“Can you tell me where we goin’ to?
Can you tell me what it is
We really wanna find?
Is the truth really there?
Or is it right under our hair?
For all we know it’s been there all the time.

I say, nothin’ comes from dreamers but dreams.
I say, sittin at night all in our bowl (TF - ?!)
While everyone else is down the street.
Nothin’ comes from talkers but sound (oh yeah).
We can talk all we want to
But the world still goes around and round.

Round and Round.(Ooh hoo)
We go round and round and round
And what we’re lookin’ for still isn’t found.”

Goddamnit all to hell, now that’s stuck in my head.

geek-out, picayune | permalink | comments (0)


Change of Plan…

Wed 21 Feb 2007

Since I no longer have a tablet, I’m no longer an ink blogger.  I’m a regular blogger, which has a gravitas, resonance and cringe-factor I didn’t expect.  Odds are I’ll still only post incoherent, infrequent, ignominious things on a very sporadic schedule.  And eventually my blog will atrophy and come to rest in digital twilight with the billions of other abandoned blogs, forming a whispering accretion disc around the black hole of the Internet.  …But, in the meantime, let the sad, solipsistic show continue*!

I still have my tabby, but it’s days of use are numbered. I bought a slick matte black MacBook.  I looked at new tabbys, but just couldn’t find the same feature fluidity and pricing I wanted.  At at the heart of it, I need something better than 512MB RAM and 1024×800 that won’t get in my way with a bunch of Vista.  While I will love my tabby’s mouse equivalents to my dying day, the trackpads on Macs isn’t as awful as I feared.  In fact, I’m actually becoming mildly efficient at it.  As for my poor tabby, I think I might use it to try out some Linux experiments, or turn it into a glorified GPS navigation system, since it perfectly matches the paint of my darlin’ S4.  …Maybe a hacky touchscreen remote control for our growing entertainment system, or a remote cat monitoring system so I can persecute our WRECs (WRetched Excuse for Cats) from work.  I just don’t know yet.

To sum up, I’m making a new resolution to give up my delusions of being an ink blogger, and be a better blogger in general.  I give it…2 weeks before I manage to rationalize my way out of it.

* I’m stuck in an alliterative loop right now, due to the fact Jake asked me to read Tom Robbins‘ “Wild Ducks Flying Backward”.  Robbins, to my mind, is florid.  He’s amusing, but as a conceit rather than in substance.  My general impression is that I’m wading through a gassy swamp of alliteration and assonance, with infrequent will-o-the-wisp moments of brilliance which were anticlimacticized (to coin a word) by friends before I even got to them.   But primarily it is lots of mossy, decaying cleverness and word games, with a whiff of sulfur.  Good book, Jake—don’t take my meaning the wrong way.  But he reminds me of Dickens.  Certainly no Twain or Gogol.

geek-out, picayune | permalink | comments (0)


Pixelated, streaming eye-candy

Wed 6 Dec 2006

My favorite indie music blog is DoCopenhagen (as in, “the people running this blog want these bands we like to play Copenhagen, Denmark, please”).  They came to my attention last year with a stellar list of the Top 50 music videos for 2005.  Well, the 2006 edition is out, and YouTube-friendly.  Check it out.  Some awesome videos.

DoCopenhagen’s Top 50 Music Videos of 2006

My favorite from the year is Field Music.  Maybe I’ve spent too much of the year whiteboarding.

picayune | permalink | comments (0)


« Previous Page Next Page »

+ - my current enthusiasm for this ui

© eightfold.net, tiffehr.com and tiffehr, a.k.a.Tiffany Fehr or Tiff Fehr. Thank you for your time and attention!