Pro-Rupert Murdoch editorials have a lot in common. For starters, they’re all published in newspapers owned by or associated with Murdoch. Then, there’s everything else about them: their argumentation, their structure, their themes, their key phrases. It’s almost as if the papers are cribbing off each other, or some kind of master Murdoch defense document.

(this post was reblogged from utnereader)

Notes

  1. jjarichardson reblogged this from thenewrepublic
  2. mediation reblogged this from thenewrepublic and added:
    probably because it works.
  3. tiffehr reblogged this from utnereader
  4. den1990 reblogged this from utnereader
  5. mcshi reblogged this from utnereader
  6. hragv reblogged this from utnereader
  7. eldowning reblogged this from utnereader
  8. bryanfriesen reblogged this from utnereader and added:
    Classic mogul style… Screw up and have the newspapers you own defend your actions! Killer!
  9. nishachittal reblogged this from utnereader
  10. angels-deserve-to-die reblogged this from leonrw and added:
    Ahh Journalism. How I am glad I am studying you.
  11. seldridge reblogged this from thenewrepublic and added:
    Well put, TNR, and echoing what a lot of people seem to be picking up on. I wonder if the Murdoch-owned papers realize...
  12. utnereader reblogged this from thenewrepublic
  13. bitingsarcasm reblogged this from thenewrepublic
  14. eventingvolunteer reblogged this from thenewrepublic
  15. leonrw reblogged this from thenewrepublic and added:
    It can’t be. Fabulous Murdoch, lord of us all, couldn’t do something so devious! This is just some liberal, leftist,...
  16. starchildnoodles reblogged this from firthofforth
  17. firthofforth reblogged this from thenewrepublic
  18. thenewrepublic posted this